Monday, January 30, 2012

Life Chapters

A few months ago, those of us who went to high school together reconnected at a joint fiftieth birthday party to celebrate our shared milestone.

It was fascinating to interact with folks after three decades apart.  Logically, these people were strangers -- unknown adults bearing little in common with their younger selves.  Yet because of our shared childhood history, there was something deep already established among us.  Walking around the room, talking with people was like discovering a lost tribe to which we all belonged.

Steve is a case in point. We first met when we were three years old when our families lived in the same apartment building.  We attended the same schools and went our separate ways after high school graduation.

We had no contact until the joint fiftieth party. Absent this event, it is unlikely our paths would have recrossed in our lifetimes.  We live 3000 miles apart.  We work in different fields.  We belong to different social networking platforms.

It was fun to chitchat in person at the party.  Thanks to my Fifty Frolics project, we're continuing to dialogue about our milestone.  Whereas my present focus is on making the most of turning fifty, Steve has a different perspective:

"As I look back, I've noticed that life can be broken into stages. Elementary school, high school, college years, gap years, different jobs, different hobbies and activities, marriage, kids, pets, retirement, sunset years.... So I guess that if I was to pass any life-goal type advice on, it would be to recognize the particular life-stage you're in and to build a set of goals according to that, preparing for each of the next expected milestones.

For me, 49, 50, 51.... I honestly don't feel that much different from year to year, so I don't tend to look at 50 as a milestone. Instead, I feel my next milestone will probably be retirement. So my most immediate "50" list is more of a list of things I'd like to do before I retire. For instance, just as you'd like to really listen to 50 albums this year - I've accumulated about 2000 albums that I'd like to listen to before I retire....Of those hundreds of artists I'd like to see as many live shows as I can....Another "50" list I have is my reading list. But it continually grows and changes, influenced by events and interests at any given point in life. So I have a similar approach to yours, but I find my time frames differ and vary in accordance with different life events." 

I agree. The important thing is to find a framework that motivates you to truly enjoy your life.  Whether you're focusing on this day, this week, this month, this year or your current life chapter,  what's important, meaningful and fulfilling to you?   How do you want to live your life? 

What about you?  How do you parse the significant chapters in your life?  How do you view your present life epoch? What are your priorities or goals during this time?  Message me or leave a comment.

Monday, January 23, 2012

About Time

One fulfilling consequence of this blog has been receiving reactions from other people turning fifty.

Take Mari's approach to her fiftieth birthday, for example: 

"My milestone is approaching fast. I have invited my relatives (there are lots of them) to a nearby museum centre where is also a museum of horology. (http://www.kellomuseo.fi/englanniksi.pdf) I just visited the horology museum and can now guide my relatives though it. Time and its passing is suitable theme for my milestone."

Suitable indeed.  It's difficult not to think about the concept of time when one contemplates the years we've already lived, and those yet to unfold.

I can recall slow summer afternoons during my childhood -- spent wondering how on earth to fill the days until school started in September.  The eons that seemed to lumber between breakfast and bedtime.

Or the impatient angst of my teen self, cramming as many extracurricular activities and two part-time jobs into the week to combat the boredom of living in a small, rural town.  It seemed like it would be forever before I would graduate and leave for university.

Then, at university, time suddenly sped up.  Poof! It was December and my first set of exams.  Poof! It was third year!  Poof!  I was finished and thrust into my next life chapter.

And time has seemed to speed up every year since then.  The months and (how is it possible?!) years have spun by faster and faster.  

These days, the weeks slip by so quickly, they blur together. I'm barely begun on Monday morning when suddenly, it's the weekend.  Or the next Monday. 

It's difficult to enjoy the passage of time when I'm feeling this temporal whiplash.

But I'm trying. Every day, several times a day, I take a few moments to just 'be'. 

Plus I'm giving special attention to this particular year -- my fiftieth.  I'm endeavouring to spend these particular fifty-two weeks well.  The rationale for aiming for (at least) 50 Frolics this year is to make a point of enjoying this time.  I'm committed to (at least) 50 Creative Projects to imbue these 365 days with purpose. My other fiftieth projects -- trying (at least) 50 New Recipes and reading (at least) 50 Books -- are a way of enriching my life during this particular period.

Will the days ever slow down?  Later in life, will time seem to decelerate?  I wonder.

***

Activity:  Think about the concept of 'time'.  What does it mean to you?  What do you notice about its passage?  What has been your perspective on time during different chapters of your life?  For example, how did you regard time as a child?  As a young adult?  Now?

Activity:  What can you do to make the most of this particular year? What would be a meaningful use of your time?

***

Monday, January 16, 2012

Word Power


Words are one of the most powerful things I know.  They can soothe and wound. They can delight and destroy.  They can entertain and transform.

The most powerful words are the ones we use to describe ourselves.  We might not even be aware of what those words are -- or where they came from.

One of my 50 CreativeProjects during my fiftieth is to work through Julia Cameron’s Vein of Gold. Today’s assignment was to identify ten of the derrogatory labels we recall from childhood.  You know -- those hurtful things someone branded us when we were young -- things like “dreamer” or “flake” or “foolish” or “not focused”.  Those spoken syllables that chided us when we were too naive to know that such descriptors were just that person’s opinion -- and probably said more about that person’s issues and personality than it did about our own.

The next step Cameron prescribes is to convert these negative labels into something more positive, helpful...and probably more accurate.  For example:   “Dilettante converts to interested in many things.  Dreamer converts to powerfully imaginative.... Eccentric converts to original.

It was distasteful to dredge up the complaints that people had about me when I was a child.  For example, my father used to call me “Lady of Leisure”.  I don’t know why.  I had a ton of extracurricular activities and part-time jobs and volunteered on top of it all. Yet every time he caught me daydreaming, he’d call out, in a teasing sing-song voice, “Hello, ‘Lady of Leisure’!”  He probably meant it jokingly, but it stung every damn time he said it.
 
Or, I distinctly recall the afternoon when one elementary school chum, with whom I’m still pals, expressed her exasperation that I “start all these different projects and never finish any of them!”  Now the truth is that I started many different projects and I finished many of them -- and the cosmic Truth is that no-one HAS to finish EVERYTHING they start.  In fact, the physical reality is that it’s absolutely impossible to do so. 

It was painful to reflect on those labels that stuck through adulthood -- things like being called ‘intense’.  I don’t enjoy being branded ‘intense’.  It makes me wince.  And yet, when I think of the people in my life I would describe as being ‘intense’, I don’t mean it as a complaint.  For them, I think of ‘intense’ as a synonym for ‘passionate’ or ‘scary smart’ or ‘focused’.

Which leads nicely into the second part of the Cameron exercise:  turning, in her words, “dross into gold”.  Reframing the negative labels into something more helpful and positive.

This was actually a very satisfying activity.

Okay, my dad implied I was ‘lazy’, but really, any downtime he witnessed was me “thinking” or “reflecting” or “imagining” or, in my own way, “trying to heal”.

My schoolchum thought I was a flake (and probably still does), but I’m perfectly content to be called “interested in many things.”  It’s true!  I am interested in many things!  I’ll shout it proudly!

When I’m slammed for being ‘intense’ in the future, I’ll translate it internally as a complement that I’m passionate, smart and/or focused.  I’m comfortable with any of those three descriptors.

It was helpful, indeed, to identify the negative labels I’d internalized, to exorcise them and to transform them into more helpful, pleasant entities.  I invite you to do the same: 

1.  write down ten negative labels you recall from childhood. 

2.  convert these negative words into more helpful interpretations of your behavior.

Bonus activity:  post your ‘golden words’ places you will see them.

I’d love to know how you find the experience -- message me or leave a comment below.

Monday, January 9, 2012

The Experimental Meal


There I was, darting through the aisles of Trader Joes, picking up grocery staples.  I’m a bit behind in my pledge to enjoy (at least) 50 Treats during my fiftieth year, so I find a suitably stinky cheese and some gorgeous pea shoots.

As I head to the cashier, a green box catches my eye. It reads “Tofurky Roast & Gravy”.  I pick up the product and examine it.  

I am not a fan of Tofurky.  Or roast.  Or gravy.  I’ve been a vegetarian since I was twelve.  I ceased eating “anything with a face” thirty-eight years ago because I didn’t like it and it didn’t like me. I’m not a zealot.  I simply prefer to prepare and eat tasty food that doesn’t happen to contain meat or fish. 

            “Don’t you crave bacon or steak or [fill in the blank]?” ask well-meaning friends.

No.  I don’t.  I’m not tempted by meat because I don’t find it palatable.  Similarly, I’m not tempted by faux meats like ‘tofurky’ because, really, if I wanted to eat something that tasted like turkey, why wouldn’t I eat the real thing rather than some super-processed, manufactured facsimile?
You understand, then, my surprise. 

            “Why on earth am I standing in the middle of Trader Joes, holding a box of “Tofurky Roast & Gravy”?”  I ask myself.

The picture on the box depicts coins of ‘tofurky’ wrapped around a rice mixture and coated in what appeared to be spoonfuls of phlegm. 

            “This looks disgusting.”

As if to prove my point, the description on the box reveals that it “includes a Tender, Juicy Stuffed Tofu Roast and Rich ‘Giblet’ Gravy”.   I mean, really.  Yuck.

The kicker?  The jaunty blue logo that announced “Serves 5!”

I buy the box.

Hey, as part of my initiative to try (at least) 50 New Recipes during my fiftieth year, it makes sense.  It is *new*.  I haven’t tried anything like it before.  Heck, I can’t imagine anything stranger.

At home, it is with a certain ghoulish delight that I slit the seal and open the box.  It contains two objects -- a margarine-tub sized container of faux gravy plus the ‘tofurky’ -- a plastic wrapped, dense, flesh-coloured ovoid about five inches in diameter.

According to the instructions on the box, you take the faux roast out of its plastic casing, put it in a casserole dish, surround it with cut vegetables, douse it in a little sage baste and bake it.  The gravy is to be warmed and served alongside the finished product.  Easy peasy.

I remove the plastic casing from the ‘roast’.  It resembles a fermented ostrich egg.  Or a super-sized squeeze ball.

For the veg, I opt for a yam, a potato, a parnip, a carrot, a leek and a red onion.  They looks attractive and colourful, nestled around the beige, plasticky orb at the center of the pan.

The “Tofurky Baste” is three tablespoons olive oil, one tablespoon soy sauce and one and a half teaspoons of ground sage.  Simple and tasty and something I’d definitely make again.

As instructed, I pour half of the baste over the tofurky, cover it in foil and pop it in the oven.
An hour and fifteen minutes later, I remove the foil and pour the remainder of the baste on the ‘roast’.

It bakes for another fifteen minutes. 

I check it.  I can’t discern whether or not the faux roast is done.  The vegetables are soft but not roasted.

I return the pan to the oven and bake it for five more minutes. 

When the timer goes, I examine the elements of the dish.  They look no different.  I have no idea if these are the results intended by the manufacturer.

            “Close enough,” I decide and turn my attention to the plastic container of faux gravy provided in the box. 

I microwave it for a minute as instructed.  When I try to stir it, I find it’s the consistency of mushroom soup concentrate, straight out of the can.  It is, in a word, gelatinous. 

            “This can’t be right,” I think. 

I nuke it for another minute and try stirring it again.  Now it’s gelatinous AND lumpy. 

            “Well I’ve heard stories about gravy being lumpy -- that that’s always the challenge come holiday time -- so this must be on the right track,” I figure. 

I stir and stir and stir.  It looks the same:  more like a contemporary art installation than something you’d actually want to ingest.

I taste it.  It coats my palate in a creamy/chewy wallpaper paste flavour.  Is this what gravy’s supposed to taste like?  I have no idea.

I turn my attention back to the tofurky.  The box instructs me to “use a serrated bread knife and shave off 1/8” to 1/4” thick pieces of the roast”, adding that “If you have leftovers, you’re all set for sandwiches, too!”

I do my best but, really, the tofurky is hot and squishy and round and stuffed with a mushy wild rice mixture.  Not the easiest thing to carve with precision.   I contemplate asking my intrepid spouse to do the honours momentarily -- but really, I don’t want to be touching this alien foodstuff so it would be unkind and unfair to make him do so.

It seems wrong to cut up the whole thing into slices -- won’t it dry out?  But the box tells me to carve the whole thing, so I do.

When sliced, surrounded by the colourful veg, it actually looks rather appetizing.   Homey and somewhat seasonal.


I plate a few slices and an assortment of vegetables.  I start with the later -- familiar territory.  They are in desperate need of seasoning.  I season them, wondering why the box didn’t (a) call for, say, salt and pepper on the veg, or (b) double the baste recipe so the vegetables would have a bit more oomph.  Were I to do this again, I’d do the latter, add pepper and also double the amount of vegetables in the pan.  

Moment of truth:  I try a small piece of the faux roast.  The texture is a little rubbery.  The flavour is ‘interesting’ in that it doesn’t really taste like anything.  I’m hampered in my review in that I have no clue what it’s supposed to taste like -- what flavour the manufacturer was trying to replicate. 

It doesn’t taste ‘bad’.  It just takes like ‘something’.  I can tell there is ‘something’ in my mouth -- I just don’t know what it is. The wild rice concoction in the interior is mushy but it tastes nice and, thankfully, is a flavour that is reminiscent of rice.

I try another half teaspoon of the godawful faux gravy.  The flavour has not improved in the minutes it’s been out of the microwave.

Maybe it’s one of those things that is better in combination with other foods?  I try a smidge on the faux roast.  The combo is ‘better’ but it’s still repulsive.  I toss the entire container and don’t even think of asking my husband to taste i.

Instead, I quiz him:  what’s in gravy, typically?  How is it made? What is it supposed to taste like?

He answers me, but now he’s curious about the alternative. 

            “What did they use?”

To my horror, he retrieves the box and starts reading, aloud, the ingredients in the faux gravy.

            “Stop!  Don’t say it out loud,” I plead him.  “I don’t want to know what I just ingested.” 

Instead, I whip up my own version of faux gravy.  I fry up a few mushrooms and shallots, deglaze with marsala, add a roux and vegetable stock plus seasonings and reduce it down to ‘gravy’ consistency.  Or at least, I aim for the consistency I’ve seen depicted in films and television as ‘gravy’. I adjust the seasonings et voila!  In minutes, I have a savoury, earthy, sage-flecked sauce created out of actual food. 

I try it on the faux roast and vegetables and it does a lovely job of harmonizing the flavours.

Good thing, too.  When I go to refrigerate the sliced tofurky, I can see it’s already drying out.  The instructions to slice up the whole thing were wrong.  Thankfully, with my homemade gravy, I can repair the damage done by the erroneous directions.

So what’s my overall verdict?  Would I make ‘tofurky roast’ again?   Possibly.  I could see preparing a modified version as a seasonal offering, if ever I need to feed four fellow vegetarians.  The faux roast is harmless enough -- and it does look attractive when sliced up and surrounded by roasted vegetables.   But I’d jazz up the veg, double the baste, make my own gravy and pair it with appropriate salads and side dishes.  And a killer dessert.

It’s somewhat moot, however.  I made this experimental meal as a way of exploring new foods -- of satisfying my goal to prepare (at least) 50 New Recipes during my fiftieth year.  “Tofurky Roast & Gravy” was certainly novel from anything I’ve ever made before.  Mission Accomplished.

 What about you?  What bizarre food products have you tried?  How did they turn out for you?